×
Discussion
is it more accurate to use the 2nd RI testing as our baseline? I have seen on some Scholastic documents that the 2nd RI test is more accurate.

We did not target the first RI administration in September (RI settings were at default level 50% percentile) and some students seem to have higher or lower scores (now that I know them). Their was a significant drop for many from Sept to Dec RI administration. on the 3rd RI In March, there were mostly gains.

Posted on: March 18 2018
Flag this discussion
Share:
2 Comments
  • AskDee

    Later testing on the Reading Inventory is can be closer to the students' reading scores than earlier testing, if you did not target the students. I'm not certain about discounting the first scores as a baseline. The second test would have occurred after a month or two of instruction. It is too late to go back and target the students, but you and your supervisors need to make that decision. (1 of 2) Dee, Ask Dee and the READ 180 Community

    AskDee

    I would suggest you read about this in the Reading Inventory Educator's Guide that you can find at http://52.1.239.6/product-support/products/ri/manuals/. I also can send you an older Best Practices guide if you email me directly at AskDee@sbcglobal.net. Those two manuals should guide you as you make your decisions. Dee, Ask Dee at the READ 180 Community

    Featured Discussions
    Tips for New READ 180 Teachers
    Think back to your first year teaching READ 180.  What is the one thing that you wish you knew then that you know now?
    Motivating Students on Software
    My students are in the early stages of System 44.  Most of them started at Series 1 and have worked their way into Series 3.  Over the course of time, some of them are…
    Assessment & Data
    Discussions from colleagues on using key implementation and student performance metrics to drive instruction.
    Classroom Instruction
    Discussions from colleagues on implementing clear organization for instruction and classroom activity, and maintaining student engagement.
    Professional Development
    Discussions from colleagues on fostering and sustaining best teaching practices in the reading intervention classroom.
    Special Education
    Discussions from colleagues on targeting the specific skill deficits and unique instructional needs of a Special Education student.
    Technology
    Discussions from colleagues on using the READ 180 technology components to provide intensive, individualized instruction.
    System 44
    Discussions from colleagues on maximizing System 44 instruction to help students master foundational reading skills.
    Prev
    Next